Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jonathan Grigsby v. Robert Horel, et al
as 11-17587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN W. GRIGSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HOREL, Warden, DARREN BRADBURY, Captain, M. SMELOSKY, Associate Warden and others
Jonathan Grigsby v. Francisco Jacquez, et al
as 09-16062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN W. GRIGSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, MARK CASTELLAW, C.E. WILBER and others
Grigsby v. Jacquez et al
as 3:2009cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Grigsby
Defendant:
Francisco Jacquez, Mark Castellaw, C.E. Wilber and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jonathan Grigsby v. Robert Horel, et al
as 08-17181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN W. GRIGSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HOREL, Warden, DARREN BRADBURY, Captain, M. SMELOSKY, Associate Warden and others
Jonathan Grigsby v. M. Evans, et al
as 08-16379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN W. GRIGSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
M. S. EVANS, Warden, T. VARIZ, E. MEDINA and others
Jonathan Grigsby v. Robert Horel
as 08-16163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN W. GRIGSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden, FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Associate Warden, P. CARRIER and others
Jonathan Grigsby v. Robert Horel, et al
as 08-16150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN W. GRIGSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden, FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, DARREN BRADBURY and others
Grigsby v. Evans et al
as 3:2008cv01843
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Grigsby
Defendant:
M.S. Evans, T. Variz, E. Medina and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grigsby v. Horel et al
as 3:2008cv01475
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Grigsby
Defendant:
Robert Horel, Darren Bradbury, M. Smelosky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grigsby v. Horel et al
as 3:2007cv02833
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Grigsby
Defendant:
Robert Horel, Francisco Jacquez, P. Carrier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
