Cases 1 - 10 of 242
6329 10th Ave LLC v. Nicole Ogarro et al
as 2:2023cv10286
Plaintiff:
6329 10th Ave LLC
Defendant:
Nicole Ogarro and Darren Jones
Dunbar Village L.P. v. David D. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv09834
Plaintiff:
Dunbar Village L.P.
Defendant:
David D. Jones and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Dunbar Village, L.P. v. David D. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv09078
Plaintiff:
Dunbar Village, L.P.
Defendant:
David Daryl Jones and Does 1 Through 20, Inclusive
Devolder et al v. Montana Rail Link, Inc. et al
as 9:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Glenn Devolder, Ernest Dunn, Bill Bradley and others
Defendant:
Montana Rail Link, Inc. and BNSF Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Minsi Wu v. LaToya Jones et al
as 8:2023cv01887
Plaintiff:
Minsi Wu
Defendant:
LaToya Jones and Regis Hearn
Brooks et al v. Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Brooks, Laura Siegel, Tiffany Vinson and others
Defendant:
Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC, Greystar California, Inc., 100 Altair, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 dtp Diversity - Deceptive Trade Practices
Louis Darcel Jones v. Michael Neal Walsh
as 2:2023cv06636
Plaintiff:
Louis Darcel Jones
Defendant:
Michael Neal Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Haifang Li v. Kiana Ronique Jones et al
as 5:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
Haifang Li
Defendant:
Kiana Ronique Jones and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mary Nelson Rogers v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A., et al
as 23-15768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY ALICE NELSON ROGERS and MARY A. NELSON ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A., CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC, MERSCORP, INC. and others
Canyon Sierra Properties, LLC v. Rodriguez S. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv02255
Plaintiff:
Canyon Sierra Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Rodriguez S. Jones and Does 1 to 10 Inclusive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
