Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Rodriguez v. Hardy et al
as 3:2023cv00660
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Respondent:
David A. Hardy and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Jose Rodriguez
as 23-10310
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ
Rodriguez v. World World Way
as 3:2023cv00295
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Respondent:
World World Way and Coalinga State Hospital
Defendant:
CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez v. World World Way et al
as 4:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Defendant:
World World Way and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Rodriguez Lagunes v. Merrick Garland
as 21-4182
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ LAGUNES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Rodriguez v. Atlanta National League Baseball Club, LLC, et al
as 5:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Defendant:
Atlanta National League Baseball Club, LLC, Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., '47 Brand, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Jose Rodriguez-Villeda v. Merrick Garland
as 21-3669
Petitioner:
JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ-VILLEDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Rodriguez v. Coalinga State Hospital
as 4:2021cv04554
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Respondent:
Coalinga State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22094
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. NAPH Care et al
as 3:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Frank Akpaty, Eloy Ituarte, Porsche Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
