Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Blanco Villalobos et al v. More Consulting Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv01601
Plaintiff:
Mario Blanco Villalobos, Arnulfo Hernandez Solorzano, Estanislao Bustillo Castro and others
Defendant:
More Consulting Corp. and Brian J. Morrell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
GAMEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22755
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE GAMEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-16097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Objector - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abdul Mohamed, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 18-16097
Appellant:
STEVEN SIDLER, DANIEL TURNER, HAROLD BROWER and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHANNON WISE, RONALD GILLETTE, BRANDON FARMER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Gamez v. Fajardo et al
as 1:2018cv00079
Petitioner:
Jose Gamez
Respondent:
Daniel Fajardo and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jose Gamez v. USA
as 17-12384
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE GAMEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gamez v. Lena Jess Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06361
Defendant:
Dean D'Amico, Janet D'Amico, J & D D'Amico Enterprises Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Gamez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gamez v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv22936
Petitioner:
Jose Gamez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gamez v. Integra Claims, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
Jose Gamez
Defendant:
Stephen Hadhazi and Integra Claims, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gamez v. Apex Systems, Inc.
as 1:2014cv07792
Plaintiff:
Jose Gamez
Defendant:
Apex Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
