Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Torres-Estrada v. Cases, et al
as 21-1521
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELVIN JOSE TORRES-ESTRADA
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLOS CASES, Special Agent In Charge, FBI Puerto Rico Office, individually and in his official capacity, JOSE GONZALEZ, FBI Agent, individually and in his official capacity, GUSTAVO RIVERA, FBI Agent, individually and in his official capacity and others
US v. Gonzalez-Carrion
as 19-2070
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
EDUARDO JOSE GONZALEZ-CARRION, a/k/a Guason
US v. Gonzalez Bernard
as 19-1779
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE GONZALEZ BERNARD, a/k/a Mudo, a/k/a Tio
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Gonzalez-Carrion
as 19-1215
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
EDUARDO JOSE GONZALEZ-CARRION, a/k/a Guason
US v. Gonzalez Bernard
as 17-1670
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE GONZALEZ BERNARD
In Re: Melecio Ramirez, et al
as 17-1185
Petitioner:
IRVING MELECIO RAMIREZ, JOSE GONZALEZ BERNARD, FELIX A. HERNANDEZ BURGOS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
US v. Gonzalez-Minyetty
as 15-2366
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN JOSE GONZALEZ-MINYETTY, a/k/a Sonny, a/k/a Juan Jose Gonzalez, a/k/a Juan Gonzalez-Minyetty
US v. Gonzalez-Piche
as 14-2149
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE GONZALEZ-PICHE, a/k/a Josue Gonzalez, a/k/a Josh Martin Gonzalez Reyes, a/k/a Josh Gonzalez, a/k/a Jose Martin Gonzalez Reyes
Stote, et al v. Umass Correctional Health Care, et al
as 14-1827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. STOTE
:
JAMES CYR and JOSE SIME
Plaintiff:
WAYNE D. CROSBY, TERRY CARTER, ENEZ KOLENVOVIC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UMASS CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, UMASS MEDICAL SCHOOL, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and others
Gonzalez v. Spencer
as 13-1571
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE GONZALEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
LUIS S. SPENCER, Superintendent, MCI Norfolk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
