Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Vasquez v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv00833
Plaintiff:
Edgar Vasquez
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Carvajal and others
Clervrain v. Keller et al
as 3:2019cv01118
Respondent:
J A Keller, Jason A Sicker, Jose Santana and others
Petitioner:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain v. Keller et al
as 1:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
J A Keller, Jason A Sicker, Ben Brieshke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casarez et al v. Davis et al
as 1:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
Antonio Nieto Casarez and Jose Santana Tovar
Defendant:
George Davis, Jr, Rex Simpson and Simpson Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyer v. Ulmen, et al
as 3:2017cv00914
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Boyer
Defendant:
Jose Santana , Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buhl v. Porco et al
as 3:2017cv00763
Plaintiff:
Leroy Buhl
Defendant:
Charles Porco and Jose Santana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine et al v. Porco et al
as 3:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine and Leroy Buhl
Defendant:
Charles Porco and Jose Santana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medrano v. The Home Depot USA Inc
as 4:2016cv02570
Defendant:
The Home Depot USA Inc and Home Depot International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Santana Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pinson v. Santana et al
as 3:2015cv02190
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Jose Santana and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stine v. Federal Bureau of Prisons Designation and Sentence Computation Unit et al
as 3:2013cv04253
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons Designation and Sentence Computation Unit, Jose Santana, Lisa Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
