Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Kay v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
Susan Kay
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 e Preauthorized transfers
Haun v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 6:2023cv00534
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Haun
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Haun v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 6:2020cv02044
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Does 1 to 50 and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Haun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Haun
as 6:2020cv00390
Defendant:
Linda Haun
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Haun et al
as 6:2018cv01990
Defendant:
Jeffrey Haun and Linda S. Haun
Plaintiff:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ye et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2017cv00902
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and John Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Qiliang Ye and Jin Zhou
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00069
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Rohillco Business Services LLC et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2015cv02270
Plaintiff:
GAP Funding Company LLC and Rohillco Business Services LLC
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Lewis et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 6:2014cv00386
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Lane Lewis and Oletta Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
