Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Granada Developers, Inc. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2021cv24253
Plaintiff:
Granada Developers, Inc.
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAYORAL et al v. SALIN et al
as 0:2021cv62074
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO MAYORAL, ALBERTO MAYORAL and CLEAR TITLE & ESCROW GROUP LLC
Defendant:
ALONDRA SALIN, JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Cheri Darling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNHAM v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv21548
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D DUNHAM
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Rodney Rutty, WELLS FARGO BANK, ,N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Obradovic v. Miele et al
as 9:2018cv80302
Plaintiff:
Brank Obradovic
Defendant:
Anne Miele, Steven Chichila, Zeljka Stojanovic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILDER v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2018cv20820
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WILDER
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Rodney Rutty, Essex Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv22605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
William Freeman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.
as 15-14944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM M. FREEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.
Cornelius v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2015cv03394
Plaintiff:
Jameel A. Cornelius
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , US Bank National Association and McCalla Raymer, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Roberts et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2014cv00304
Plaintiff:
Owen Roberts and Wanda Roberts
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 6:2014cv00121
Plaintiff:
William M. Freeman
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
