Cases 21 - 30 of 2,407
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Linoy Lagziel Kanino v. Shimon Shalom Kanino et al
as 2:2024cv01798
Petitioner:
Linoy Lagziel Kanino
Respondent:
Shimon Shalom Kanino, American Express Company, East West Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ning Yang v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Ning Yang
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Does 1-20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robert S. Arevalo v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Robert Arevalo
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fieck v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Erin Fieck
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
