Cases 61 - 70 of 159
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Verrett et al v. Mortgage Services III et al
as 3:2017cv01714
Defendant:
First American Flood Data Services, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA and Mortgage Services III
Plaintiff:
Dawn Verrett and Randy Verrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv03499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ghanta v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
as 3:2017cv02742
Plaintiff:
Venkata Ghanta
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. $159,788.02, More or Less, in U.S. Currency Contained in JPMorgan Chase Bank Account #XXXX7465 et al
as 5:2017mc00945
Respondent:
$159,788.02, More or Less, in U.S. Currency Contained in JPMorgan Chase Bank Account #XXXX7465
Claimant:
Washima Begum and Mohammod A. Khan
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Caldwell v. Hillcrest, Davidson, and Associates LLC
as 3:2017mc00061
Plaintiff:
Lee Caldwell
Defendant:
Hillcrest, Davidson, and Associates LLC
Garnishee:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Counter_claimant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Counter_defendant:
Lee Caldwell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
