Cases 61 - 70 of 234
Miszczyszyn v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2018cv03633
Plaintiff:
Evelina Miszczyszyn
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC et al v. Black et al
as 1:2018cv03447
Defendant:
Bernard S. Black , Samuel Black , Anthony Dain and others
Plaintiff:
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. FBOP Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv04307
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
PMT Credit Opportunities Fund Ltc., Gordon C. Watson, Canyon Balanced Master Fund, Ltd. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Intervenor Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
as 1:2018cv00186
Plaintiff:
Thomas John Carter
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McBride v. Ya'cup et al
as 1:2017cv08213
Plaintiff:
Dytaniel McBride
Defendant:
John R Ya'cup , Brian L Berntson , James E. Shadid and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donelson v. Safeguard Properties, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv07853
Plaintiff:
Shirley Donelson
Defendant:
Safeguard Properties, LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
