Cases 31 - 40 of 509
Nyro Frederick v. Florida Department of Corr.
as 19-12082
Petitioner / Appellant:
NYRO G. FREDERICK
Defendant / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Julie L. Jones, Secretary
Coleman v. Inch et al
as 3:2019cv00319
Defendant:
B. Roberts, K.N. Box, Felicia D. Chestnut and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Jones et al
as 6:2019cv00564
Defendant:
Antonio Saunders, C. Casimir, Dustin Mugg and others
Plaintiff:
William Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOVA v. JONES et al
as 1:2019cv21668
Defendant:
JANE DOE, TWO UNKNOWN STATE CLASSIFICATION OFFICERS, C. Greene and others
Plaintiff:
TONY E NOVA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. SUMMERS et al
as 3:2019cv01183
Respondent:
ADDISON SUMMERS and JULIE L JONES
Petitioner:
JOHN JULIUS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. Scott et al
as 3:2019cv00318
Defendant:
B. Roberts, J. S. Edwards, Robert Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Moore v. Julie Jones, et al
as 19-11147
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID B. ROGERS, FBI Chief USA et al.,, JIMMY COKER, Warden, et al., ROBERT M. THOMAS, CEO Almanac Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY L. MOORE, Royal Sovereign King
Rowe et al v. Excellent et al
as 3:2019cv00263
Defendant:
Amy S Frizzell, Julie Jones, MD Ana Excellent and others
Plaintiff:
Normal J Rowe, Dominique T Rowe, Robert P Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUTCHINS v. JONES et al
as 3:2019cv00445
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ASHFORD HUTCHINS
Defendant:
JIMMY COKER, JULIE L JONES, J SLOAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaney v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv20541
Defendant:
Secretary Florida Department of Corrections, JULIE L JONES and Courtney McNeil
Plaintiff:
Joseph Louis Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
