Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Navas v. Polaha et al
as 3:2019cv00249
Defendant:
Ronald Longtin, Jr., Joseph Plater, Jerom M. Polaha and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Navas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julio Navas v. USDC-NVR
as 19-71100
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JULIO CESAR NAVAS
Not Yet Classified:
JAMES BACA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR NAVAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
NAVAS v. STATE OF NEVADA et al
as 1:2019cv01323
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA and JEROME M. POLAHA
Plaintiff:
JULIO CESAR NAVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Navas v. Rankin et al
as 3:2018cv00088
Defendant:
Jr. Ronald Lonting, David Rankin and Deborah Schumacher
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Navas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Navas v. Qualls et al
as 3:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Navas
Defendant:
Joseph Plater, Jerom M. Polaha and Thomas Qualls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Navas v. Schumacher et al
as 3:2018cv00041
Defendant:
Ronal Lonting, Jr., David Rankin and Debora Schumacher
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Navas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navas v. Van Ry et al
as 3:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Navas
Defendant:
Thomas Quals and Keven Van Ry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navas v. Polaha et al
as 3:2018cv00019
Defendant:
Lilly Clarkson, Joseph Plater, Jerome Polaha and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Navas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navas v. Polaha et al
as 3:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Navas
Defendant:
Joseph Plater and Jerome Polaha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Julio Navas v. James Baca, et al
as 17-17314
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIO CESAR NAVAS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES BACA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
