Cases 51 - 60 of 69
Gonzalez v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02555
Defendant:
ELIQUITECH, INC., ALTRIA ENTERPRISES LLC, CORE-MARK HOLDING COMPANY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Rudolf Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01324
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., EONSMOKE, LLC, GULF MART and others
Plaintiff:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'REILLY v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00778
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC. and ALTRIA GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM O'REILLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENNRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. JUUL LABS, INC.
as 2:2020cv00402
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Plaintiff:
PENNRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
EISENHAUER v. JUUL LABS INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00343
Defendant:
JUUL LABS INC., SHEETZ, INC. and ALTRIA GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
TYLER EISENHAUER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05918
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., GURU KOP, INC. and MARKET 24, LLC
Plaintiff:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NESHAMINY SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. JUUL LABS, INC.
as 2:2019cv05654
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Plaintiff:
NESHAMINY SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
RYAN v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05551
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE RYAN
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC. and PAX LABS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01523
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC. and PAX LABS, INC.
Plaintiff:
THOMAS COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. JUUL LABS, INC.
as 2:2019cv05465
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
