Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00578
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Teague v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2009cv00476
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Steve Beshear, Janie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ja-Ron Teague v. Louisville Metro Government
as 09-5607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT
Ja-Ron Teague v. Louisville Metro Government
as 09-5608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT
Ja-Ron Teague v. KY, et al
as 09-5593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, CITY OF LOUISVILLE, LOUISVILLE METRO CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT and others
Ja-Ron Teague v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 09-5587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
Teague v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2009cv00325
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Steve Besher, Ernie Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ja-Ron Teague v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al
as 09-5372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, CITY OF LOUISVILLE, LOUISVILLE METRO CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT and others
Ja-Ron Teague v. Tom Campbell, et al
as 09-5373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM CAMPBELL, Director of the Louisville Metro Department of Corrections and LOUISVILLE METRO CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT
Ja-Ron Teague v. KY, et al
as 09-5349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, JANE DOE, Judge and JOHN DOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
