Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Teague v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2009cv00080
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00075
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Teague v. Bolton et al
as 3:2009cv00065
Petitioner:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Respondent:
Mark Bolton and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Teague v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2008cv00673
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, City of Louisville, Louisville Metro Corrections Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Teague v. City of Louisville et al
as 3:2008cv00643
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
City of Louisville and Metro Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Teague v. Louisville Metro Government
as 3:2008cv00584
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Teague v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2008cv00583
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Teague v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2008cv00366
Plaintiff:
Ja-Ron S. Teague
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ja-Ron Teague v. Jerry Abramson, et al
as 08-5695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY ABRAMSON, LAURA KNOPF, JUDGE COLLINS, District Court # 304 and others
Ja-Ron Teague, et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al
as 08-5693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOES, All Inmates under Jurisdiction of (LMDC) Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, CHAD MCQUILLING, DARRYL BUNZY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT, JERRY ABRAMSON, Mayor of Louisville and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
