Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Edwards v. Delaware Department of Correction et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
William Jack Edwards
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Correction and VitalCore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Husty v. Catalent, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Cameron Husty
Defendant:
J. Martin Carroll, Madhavan Balachandran, Michael J. Barber and others
Nominal Defendant:
Catalent, Inc.
Wilson v. Charah Soultions Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Charah Soultions Inc., Robert Decensi, Jonathan Batarseh and others
Wilhelm v. Charah Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Charah Solutions, Inc., Robert Decensi, Jonathan Batarseh and others
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. v. Authentixx LLC
as 1:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Authentixx LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
Shabazz v. Bruce et al
as 1:2023cv00651
Petitioner:
Danny Amen Anderson Valentine Shabazz
Respondent:
Kathleen Jennings, Charles Butler, Treasuror Jack Markell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. v. Dynapass IP Holdings LLC
as 1:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Dynapass IP Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement
Walker v. City of Harrington Delaware et al
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Russell E. Scott Walker and Scott Walker
Defendant:
City of Harrington Delaware, Duane Bivans, Joseph Perna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Happle v. Sweeney et al
as 1:2022cv01612
Plaintiff:
Thomas Martin-Happle and Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Michael Sweeney, Jack McNiff, Paul Margiotta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Steel Connect, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01213
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Steel Connect, Inc., Warren G. Lichtenstein, Glen M. Kassan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
