Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ferm v. Veltmann et al
as 4:2021cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jack Ferm
Defendant:
Gary Ilmanen, Aziel Corporation, David Bryant, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Attorney General State of Nevada v. Ferm
as 2:2016cv02650
Plaintiff:
Attorney General State of Nevada
Defendant:
Jack Ferm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Ferm v. McCarty et al
as 2:2012cv00782
Defendant:
8 News Now General Manager, 8newsnow.com, Paula Francis and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Ferm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Ferm v. Crown Equity Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02075
Defendant:
Crown Equity Holdings Inc., Yahoo ID, Mike Zaman and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Ferm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Alfred Sapse, et al v. Jack Ferm
as 10-15850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED T. SAPSE, Husband
Plaintiff:
RENEE SAPSE, Wife
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK FERM
Alfred Sapse, et al v. Jack Ferm
as 09-16550
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED T. SAPSE, Husband and RENEE SAPSE, Wife
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK FERM
Sapse et al v. Ferm
as 2:2009cv00779
Plaintiff:
Alfred T. Sapse and Renee Sapse
Defendant:
Jack Ferm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Jack Ferm v. Glen A Holden Jr et al
as 2:2007cv02066
Plaintiff:
Jack Ferm
Defendant:
Glen A Holden, Jr, Glen A Holden, Jr, Jon Borderud and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wound Center Management Associates, Inc. v. Jack Ferm et al
as 2:2007cv02011
Plaintiff:
Wound Center Management Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Jack Ferm, Stephen Gale and Does
Counter Claimant:
Jack Ferm
Counter Defendant:
Does and Wound Center Management Associates, Inc.
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Jack Ferm
ThirdParty Defendant:
Borderud Law Group, Jon Borderud, Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
