Cases 1 - 10 of 479
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DANTZLER v. JORDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant:
WILLIAM WILL JORDEN, DOUGLAS WELBORN, ALVIN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JACKSON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
MELVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
JACKSON v. WORMUTH
as 1:2023cv03684
Plaintiff:
STEVEN M JACKSON and STEVEN M. JACKSON
Defendant:
CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
ANDALUSIA HEALTH et al v. XAVIER BECERRA
as 1:2023cv03527
Plaintiff:
ANDALUSIA HEALTH, CENTURA ST. CATHERINE HOSPITAL DODGE CITY, HAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Not Classified By Court:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
JACKSON v. ACLU NATIONAL PRISON PROJECT
as 1:2023cv03200
Plaintiff:
ROY JACKSON
Defendant:
ACLU NATIONAL PRISON PROJECT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSSMANN v. SAPIN et al
as 1:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
LINDA SAPIN, PHILIP PULASKI, JOHN MAXWELL FINLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. OLEXA et al
as 1:2023cv02620
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G. JACKSON, III
Defendant:
MICHAEL OLEXA, KARA OLEXA, ROBERT MANFRED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
