Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Thorton v. IDOC et al
as 1:2023cv04348
Plaintiff:
Marc Thorton
Defendant:
IDOC, NRC, Jacksonville C C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Fox v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03127
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fox
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hasan v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03129
Plaintiff:
Khalid Hasan
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abubakr v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03125
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Abubakr
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fair v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03113
Plaintiff:
Mickey Fair
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03109
Plaintiff:
Jalen Robinson
Defendant:
Cherryl Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03111
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jackson
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Majors v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03117
Plaintiff:
Thomas Majors
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Hinthorne et al
as 3:2023cv03119
Plaintiff:
Jamarlin Porter
Defendant:
Cherryle Hinthorne and Jacksonville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
