Cases 11 - 20 of 62
SMITH v. BEASLEY
as 7:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
ROY MANDELL SMITH
Defendant:
Lt AARON KIRK, Supervisor KEVIN CONNOLLY, NED M MIKULA and others
Respondent:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCKISSIC v. BEASLEY
as 7:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
CARLTON MCKISSIC
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
ANTIJUAN HILL
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, LYNN GIBSON, HEATHER DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS ALONZO SIMS
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, LT KERN, SGT CARGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WORTHEN v. BEASLEY
as 7:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
TREVIS WORTHEN
Respondent:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCLENDON v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EARL MCCLENDON
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, OFC THOMPSON, RALPH SHROPSHIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIPORE v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
MWAMARATUNGA PIPORE
Defendant:
JACOB BEASLEY, RALPH SHROPSHIRE, DELISHA BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkerson v. Shepard et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
John Christopher Wilkerson
Defendant:
Ronald Shepard, Jermaine White, Counselor Veronica Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. BEASLEY
as 7:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HUNTER
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANN v. MORRISON et al
as 7:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
ADRIEL NOEL MANN, SR
Defendant:
TANGIE MORRISON, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD, OFFICER GILLUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
