Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Walker v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv09585
Plaintiff:
Jade Walker
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Booker v. Larry et al
as 1:2026cv09255
Plaintiff:
Charlie Booker
Defendant:
Catherine Larry, John Nwokocha, John Adediran and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Alford et al
as 1:2026cv01321
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
. Alford, Jade Sullivan, Nikki Rambo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Cooley et al
as 1:2026cv01320
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
. Cooley, . Warr, . Trainor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2026cv01322
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Jade Sullivan, . Cooley, . Tayna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2026cv01300
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Jade Sullivan, Teta Fegina, . Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2026cv01297
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Jade Sullivan, Amanda .., . Sharely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Taylor v. Tayna et al
as 1:2026cv01264
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Tayna .., Megan .., Regina .. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2026cv01211
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Jade Sullivan, . Regina, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
