Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jackson v. USA
as 2:2023cv00198
Petitioner:
Tyson Jamal Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson v. USA
as 2:2022cv00187
Petitioner:
Tyson Jamal Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jamal Jackson
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Dale Wainwright, Lorie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. TDCJ
as 4:2019cv04659
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jamal Jackson
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Director
as 6:2019cv00302
Defendant:
TDCJ Director
Petitioner:
Terrence Jamal Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. The State of Texas
as 5:2015cv00955
Petitioner:
Matthew Jamal Jackson
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Pamerleau et al
as 5:2015cv00833
Defendant:
A. Banasco, Bexar County Judicial Officials, Bexar County Prosecutorial Officials and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jamal Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Bastrop County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2015cv00786
Defendant:
Bastrop County Sheriff's Department, Bastrop County, Texas, Deputy Conor Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jamal Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. State of Texas
as 5:2015cv00657
Petitioner:
Matthew Jamal Jackson
Respondent:
Nicholas LaHood, Sheriff Susan L. Pamerleau, Ronald Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Pamerleau et al
as 5:2015cv00509
Defendant:
A. Banasco, Bexar County Judicial Officials, Bexar County Prosecutorial Officials and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jamal Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
