Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Jones v. McNeil et al
as 6:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
James Jones, Squire James Jones, Jr. and Derrick Joseph Jones
Defendant:
Warden Unknown McNeil, Asst. Warden Unknown Marshall, C.O. Unknown Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 9:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Willie James Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02753
Petitioner:
Willie James Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Unknown
as 4:2023cv02382
Plaintiff:
Patrick Alan Frazier
Defendant:
Unknown, Sheriff Michael Vincent, Lt. Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Home Depot USA Inc
as 3:2023cv00776
Plaintiff:
James Jones
Defendant:
Home Depot USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00279
Petitioner:
James Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones et al v. TransX, LTD. et al
as 7:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Tony James Jones and Vanna Jones
Defendant:
TransX, LTD., John Bee Rinehart and Noe Pena
Cross Claimant:
Kiabet Gonzalez
Cross Defendant:
John B. Rinehart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2021cv00619
Petitioner:
James Jones
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JRT Gauges, LLC v. Jones
as 4:2021cv03344
Plaintiff:
JRT Gauges, LLC
Defendant:
James Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Jones et al v. Pena
as 7:2021cv00121
Defendant:
TransX, LTD., John Bee Rinehart and Noe Pena
Plaintiff:
Vanna Jones and Tony James Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
