Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Taylor v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq00314
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
James Taylor
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. Campos et al
as 1:2020cv01368
Plaintiff:
Ervin James Taylor
Defendant:
Eduardo Echevarria and Julio Campos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Swedish Covenant Hospital et al
as 1:2020cv00914
Plaintiff:
Ervin James Taylor
Defendant:
Samantha Margaritis, Patte Christine and Swedish Covenant Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Antunez
as 1:2020cv00128
Plaintiff:
Ervin James Taylor
Defendant:
E Antunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv07106
Defendant:
John W O'Callaghan, Arthur Young, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Ervin James Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Axon Body Worn Camera et al
as 1:2019cv06638
Defendant:
Doug Klint, Detective Perriwe, Eduardo Echevarria and others
Plaintiff:
Ervin James Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Swedish Covenant Hospital et al
as 1:2019cv06424
Defendant:
Officer J Campos, Abraham Rivera, Nurse Irene Perez Joy and others
Plaintiff:
Ervin James Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Cook County Sheriff et al
as 1:2019cv06235
Plaintiff:
Ervin James Taylor
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff, Thomas J Dart and Officer Nassbaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W. James Taylor, Inc. v. Taylor Roofing Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01107
Plaintiff:
W. James Taylor, Inc.
Defendant:
Taylor Roofing Solutions, Inc. and Gerrit Yank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
James v. Pfister et al
as 4:2016cv04237
Plaintiff:
Eddie James
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Nickelson, Craig Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
