Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Johnson v. Societal CDMO, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Societal CDMO, Inc., Wayne B. Weisman, William L. Ashton and others
Smith v. Societal CDMO, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Morgan Smith
Defendant:
Societal CDMO, Inc., Wayne B. Weisman, William L. Ashton and others
Howie, derivatively on behalf of Camber Energy Inc. v. Doris et al
as 4:2022cv02167
Plaintiff:
Robert Howie, derivatively on behalf of Camber Energy Inc.
Defendant:
James A Doris, Frank A. Barker, Jr., Fred S Zeidman and others
Grzelak v. Wainwright et al
as 1:2020cv01212
Defendant:
Gilbert L. "Chip&q Baird, Niki Leondakis, Robert Krolik and others
Plaintiff:
Iwona Grzelak
Nominal Defendant:
The RealReal, Inc.
Parshall et al v. Fidelity Southern Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01098
Defendant:
Clyde W. Shepherd, III, H. Palmer Proctor, Jr., Rodney D. Bullard and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Miller
as 3:2018cv05761
Defendant:
James Douglas Miller
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Judd v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. et al
as 4:2018cv00799
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Judd
Defendant:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V., Marsha C. Williams, L. Richard Flury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patel v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. et al
as 4:2018cv00550
Plaintiff:
Parimal Patel
Defendant:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V., L. Richard Flury, Forbes I.J. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Maresh v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. et al
as 4:2018cv00498
Plaintiff:
Terry Maresh
Defendant:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V., Marsha C. Williams, L. Richard Flury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maresh v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. et al
as 1:2018cv00238
Plaintiff:
Terry Maresh
Defendant:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V., Comet I B.V., Comet II B.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
