Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22185
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. ROBINSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv42810
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES L ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STRINGER v. ROBINSON et al
as 3:2020cv03587
Defendant:
Trane U.S. Inc., Gelco Fleet, James Clifton Robinson, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Braddy v. Robinson
as 1:2019cv25140
Defendant:
James T. Robinson, The Trap Lounge and James T. Robinson doing business as Booby Trap Lounge also known as The Trap Lounge
Plaintiff:
Stacey Braddy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Braddy v. Robinson
as 1:2019cv22993
Defendant:
James T. Robinson and The Trap Lounge
Plaintiff:
Stacey Braddy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv20091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Robinson et al v. Zurich American Insurance Company
as 8:2013cv01367
Plaintiff:
James E. Robinson and Fleita Blackmon
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Robinson v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 2:2012cv00396
Petitioner:
James D. Robinson
Respondent:
Secretary, DOC and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2010cv80034
Plaintiff:
James Edward Robinson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. SMITH et al
as 4:2007cv00268
Plaintiff:
JAMES T ROBINSON
Defendant:
BETTY SMITH and TERREANCE MCCLAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
