Cases 1 - 10 of 12
KARP v. INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv19950
Plaintiff:
MOLLY KARP
Defendant:
INVESTORS BANCORP, INC., KEVIN CUMMINGS, JOHN E. HARMON, SR. and others
FRADELAKIS v. INVESTORS BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv17907
Plaintiff:
GEORGE FRADELAKIS
Defendant:
INVESTORS BANCORP, INC., KEVIN CUMMINGS, DOMENICK CAMA and others
WARD v. CAMERON
as 5:2015cv03703
Petitioner:
JAMES F. WARD
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RBC BANK (USA) v. PETROZZINI et al
as 3:2012cv00155
Plaintiff:
RBC BANK (USA)
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
J. SCOTT PETROZZINI and JILL PETROZZINI
Not Classified By Court:
WILLIAM A. DRIER
3Rd Party Defendant:
LAND RESOURCE, LLC, LR BUFFALO CREEK, LLC, SUSAN GARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51460
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. WARD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WARD v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66800
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. WARD
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARD et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv40794
Plaintiff:
JAMES H WARD and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WARD v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34477
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. WARD
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WARD, SR v. A.C. AND S. INC. et al
as 2:2008cv89862
Plaintiff:
JAMES A WARD, SR
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, AIRCO INC./THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WARD v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv66744
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. WARD and JAMES W. WARD
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
