Cases 51 - 60 of 69
Whittle v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2010at00079
Plaintiff:
James Allen Whittle
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Coffey et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al
as 3:2009cv04161
Plaintiff:
Mark Coffey, James Allen, Margie Andrews and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Coffey et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al
as 4:2009cv04161
Plaintiff:
Mark Coffey , James Allen , Margie Andrews and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP , AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gamache v. Sgt. and others
as 5:2009cv03870
Plaintiff:
James Allen Gamache
Defendant:
Sgt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Allen Ivins v. M Martel
as 5:2009cv01022
Petitioner:
James Allen Ivins
Respondent:
M Martel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01211
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009at00693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
James Allen v. State of California et al
as 5:2008cv00828
Petitioner:
James Allen
Respondent:
Matthew Martel and State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodall v. Hernandez et al
as 3:2008cv01132
Petitioner:
Shawn James Allen Woodall
Respondent:
Robert J Hernandez and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Almager
as 1:2007cv01174
Petitioner:
James Allen Thomas
Respondent:
Victor M. Almager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
