Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Alexander v. Springer et al
as 3:2024cv02139
Plaintiff:
Carrie Alexander
Defendant:
Daniel D. Springer, Enrique Salem, Peter Solvik and others
Karen L. Fox, IRA v. Springer et al
as 3:2022cv05343
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Fox, IRA
Defendant:
Daniel D Springer, Maggie Wilderotter, Blake J. Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Votto v. Springer et al
as 3:2022cv02987
Plaintiff:
Peter Votto
Defendant:
Daniel Springer, DocuSign, Inc., Michael Sheridan and others
Lapin v. Springer et al
as 3:2022cv02980
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lapin
Defendant:
Daniel D. Springer, Enrique Salem, Peter Solvik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Blackwell v. Forescout Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv05365
Defendant:
Hezy Yeshurun, David Dewalt, Mark Jensen and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Blackwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bushansky v. Forescout Technologies, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv05283
Defendant:
Yehezkel Yeshurun, Mark Jensen, Forescout Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Bushansky v. Forescout Technologies, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv01867
Defendant:
Yehezkel Yeshurun, Mark Jensen, Forescout Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Henry v. Tyler et al
as 3:2019cv02869
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Susan R. Salka, Wayne A. Budd and others
Plaintiff:
Jean E. Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evanston Police Pension Fund v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv06524
Plaintiff:
Evanston Police Pension Fund
Defendant:
James Beer, McKesson Corporation and John H. Hammergren
Evanston Police Pension Fund v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv06525
Plaintiff:
Evanston Police Pension Fund
Defendant:
James Beer, McKesson Corporation and John H. Hammergren
Petitioner:
Therese Halscheid and Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
