Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Kenneth Hibbler v. State of Nevada, et al
as 11-16168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH HIBBLER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRUCE BANNISTER and others
Ricky Grundy v. Howard Skolnik, et al
as 11-16136
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY LEE GRUNDY
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNIK, GREG COX, BRUCE BANNESTER, Dr. and others
David Riker v. James Benedetti, et al
as 11-55642
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT RIKER
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES BENEDETTI, Warden, Northern Nevada Correctional Center, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, MATTHEW CATE, Secretary and others
James Kenner v. J. Mercer, et al
as 11-15538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES JEFFERSON KENNER
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MERCER, R. TICE, GARIBALDI and others
Doyle Lancaster v. Washoe County, Nevada, et al
as 11-80059
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
DOYLE DOLEN LANCASTER
Defendant - Respondent:
WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA, CITY OF RENO, NEVADA, MICHAEL HALEY and others
Ricky Grundy v. Howard Skolnik, et al
as 11-15421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY LEE GRUNDY
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNIK, GREG COX, BRUCE BANNESTER, Dr. and others
Hibbler v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2011cv00067
Defendant:
Dr. Bruce Bannister, James Benedetti, C/O Bergstrum and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hibbler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00061
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Clyde Means v. James Benedetti, et al
as 11-15107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLYDE H. MEANS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BENEDETTI, JULIO CALDERIN, RICHARD GARCIA and others
Howard Ellis v. James Benedetti, et al
as 11-15103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BENEDETTI, C BURSON, TONY CORDA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
