Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DOE v. DOE
as 2:2022cv02511
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
JAMES DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Doe et al v. 47th St. Food, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01008
Plaintiff:
John Doe and James Doe
Defendant:
47th St. Food, Inc. doing business as Blake & Todd, 53rd St. Food, LLC doing business as Blake & Todd, 52 Van Food Corp. doing business as Blake & Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LOPEZ et al v. 7-ELEVEN, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv03696
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. , ABC COMPANY, ALPESH PATEL and others
Plaintiff:
ELDER AUGUSTIN LOPEZ , ELBIN AUGUSTIN and ELIO PEREZ ESTEBAN
Cross_claimant:
NICK PATEL and SANJIV JOSH
Cross_defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC. , ALPESH PATEL and JENNY PATEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Doe et al v. Sears Holdings Corporation Employee Welfare Benefit Plan et al
as 1:2013cv02941
Plaintiff:
John Doe and James Doe
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation Employee Welfare Benefit Plan, Sears Holdings Corporation Administrative Committee , Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Igene v. Miracle Security, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00149
Defendant:
James Doe, Hunter Roberts Construction Group, LLC, Miracle Security, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Esther Igene
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Schmidt v. Chrysler LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00654
Plaintiff:
Karen Schmidt and Karen Schmidt
Defendant:
Chrysler LLC, Chrysler LLC, Chrysler LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Camacho-Torres et al v. Betancourt-Vazquez et al
as 3:2007cv01691
Plaintiff:
Alvan Camacho-Torres, Abigail Fraguada-Figueroa and Conjugal Partnership Camacho-Fraguada
Defendant:
Maria del C. Betancourt-Vazquez, John Doe, Conjugal Partnership Doe-Betancourt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
