Cases 1 - 10 of 694
Reed v. Bean, et al.
as 24-2705
Plaintiff:
DAVID L REED
Defendant:
BEAN, Associate Warden, Lt GLENN FOWLER, JAMES DZURENDA, Director and others
Ho v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Edmund Ho
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silsattanak v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Erik Silsattanak
Defendant:
The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, James Dzurenda, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Marque Gardeley
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv00764
Petitioner:
Kyrel L. Coleman
Respondent:
James Dzurenda and Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luddy v. Dzurenda
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Alfred D. Luddy
Defendant:
James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wilson
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Christopher P. Dericco, Jeremy Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabalan v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cabalan
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meas v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jerry Meals
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Dzurenda
as 24-1647
Petitioner:
LOUIS RANDOLPH and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
JAMES DZURENDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
