Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Denson , Jr. v. Abbott, et al
as 08-1242
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMMIE LEE DENSON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. ABBOTT, Warden C.T.C.F. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Slonimsky v. Abbott et al
as 1:2008cv01167
Petitioner:
Genady B. Slonimsky
Respondent:
James E. Abbott and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Denson v. Abbott et al
as 1:2008cv00520
Petitioner:
Sammie Lee Denson, Jr.
Respondent:
James E. Abbott and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Abbott et al
as 1:2008cv00051
Plaintiff:
Rolando J. Martinez
Defendant:
James E. Abbott, Richard G. Lins, Robert Dirkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Abbott et al
as 1:2007cv01980
Petitioner:
Mary B. Johnson
Respondent:
James E. Abbott and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edmiston v. Abbott et al
as 1:2007cv01576
Petitioner:
David E. Edmiston
Respondent:
James E. Abbott and John Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edmonds v. Abbott et al
as 1:2007cv01456
Petitioner:
Steaves Louis Edmonds
Respondent:
James E. Abbott and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Abbott
as 1:2007cv01304
Plaintiff:
Clovis Carl Green, Jr.
Defendant:
James E. Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. Abbott et al
as 1:2007cv00835
Petitioner:
Andrew Phillip Elliott
Respondent:
James E. Abbott and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Abbott et al
as 1:2007cv00773
Petitioner:
Clovis Carl Green, Jr.
Respondent:
James E. Abbott and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
