Cases 11 - 20 of 202
Carmichael v. Gittere et al
as 2:2018cv00421
Defendant:
Renee Baker, James G. Cox, William Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmichael v. Gittere et al
as 3:2018cv00106
Defendant:
Renee Baker, James G. Cox, William Gittere and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamal Hendrix v. James Cox, et al
as 17-17047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES G. COX, SHERYL FOSTER, RENEE BAKER, Warden and others
Felton Matthews, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 17-15712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELTON L. MATTHEWS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, STATE OF NEVADA and others
Stewart v. Aranas, et al.
as 3:2017cv00132
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Cheryl Burson, S.L. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lance Reberger v. Harold Byrne, et al
as 17-15242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE REBERGER
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD M. BYRNE, J. PARR, R. MONTOYA and others
Matthews v. USA et al
as 3:2017cv00050
Defendant:
E. Anderson, Renee Baker, Mrs. Barrett and others
Plaintiff:
Felton L. Matthews, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickett v. Cox et al
as 2:2016cv02669
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, Brown, James G. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Marquese Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael McLaughlin v. James Cox, et al
as 16-16869
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. MCLAUGHLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES G. COX, BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr., NEWTON and others
Michael Hissung v. Romeo Aranas, et al
as 16-16790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID HISSUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
ROMEO ARANAS, ISIDRO BACA, JAMES G. COX and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
