Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Redmond v. Kelly et al
as 1:2023cv10289
Plaintiff: Jr Richard Redmond and Richard Redmond
Defendant: Michael Kelly, James Glasgow, Herald News Reporter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Glasgow et al
as 1:2023cv00898
Plaintiff: Anthony B. Wright
Defendant: James Glasgow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potkaj v. Watkins et al
as 1:2022cv07176
Plaintiff: Tomasz Potkaj
Defendant: John Prinzi, Michael Kulovitz, James Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glasgow v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2022pq01880
Special Master: Randi Ellis
Plaintiff: James Glasgow
Defendant: Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peppers v. Jones et al
as 1:2017cv09115
Plaintiff: Brain David Peppers
Defendant: Sara F Jones, James Landeros, Unkown Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Rozak et al
as 1:2017cv02230
Plaintiff: Ian Kelly Clark
Defendant: Daniel J Rozak, Andrea Lynn Chasteen, Erin M. Krone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burley v. Bollingbrook Police Dept et al
as 1:2016cv04289
Plaintiff: Diane E. Burley, Melissa Agunloye and D'Anne Burley
Defendant: Bollingbrook Police Dept, Tom Ross, James Glasgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Clark v. Kelly et al
as 1:2015cv06506
Plaintiff: Ian Kelly Clark
Defendant: Mike Kelly, Daniel J Rozak, Frank A. Astrella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landerman v. Hosey et al
as 1:2014cv09910
Plaintiff: Adam Landerman
Defendant: Joe Hosey, City Of Joliet, Officer(s) John Doe(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chance v. Glasgow
as 1:2014cv09264
Plaintiff: Jason Chance
Defendant: James Glasgow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?