Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Devine v. Rosencrance et al
as 2:2022cv14411
Defendant:
James Gregory Rosencrance doing business as Cleveland Clinic also known as Indian River Hospital also known as Indian River Medical Center, Indian River Hospital, Indian River Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
R. Devine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13778
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DUCKWORTH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23611
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GREGORY DUCKWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: James Sears
as 21-11730
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES GREGORY SEARS
Mary Outlaw, et al v. Plantation Pipe Line Company, et al
as 21-11787
Defendant / Appellee:
PLANTATION PIPE LINE COMPANY and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS LP
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY JOSEPHINE OUTLAW and JAMES GREGORY OUTLAW
CORY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14722
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GREGORY CORY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREGORY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08183
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES GREGORY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDONALD v. BAINBRIDGE GEORGIA et al
as 1:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
JAMES GREGORY MCDONALD
Defendant:
BAINBRIDGE GEORGIA, CHIP WILLIAM NIX, CITY OF BAINBRIDGE GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
