Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Jerry Hooks v. Bruce Bannister, et al
as 14-15476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY HOOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE R. BANNISTER, RONALD BRYANT, HAROLD BYRNE and others
Steven Braunstein v. James Cox
as 14-70297
Petitioner:
STEVEN BRAUNSTEIN
Respondent:
JAMES GREGORY COX
Randolph v. The State of Nevada, Ex Rel, Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00148
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Century Link Sales Solutions, Inc., James Gregory Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hooks v. Bannister et al
as 3:2012cv00682
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, Ronald Bryant, Harold Byrne and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Jones v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 12-16571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, BACA, COLE MORROW and others
Nabors v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv01044
Defendant:
R Bannister, James Gregory Cox, Pamela Delporto and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie Nabors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
George v. N.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2012cv00991
Defendant:
James Gregory Cox, S. Espinoza, N.D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff:
David George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan Dennie v. Brian Williams, et al
as 12-15764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN DENNIE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, CHERYL BURSON and JAMES GREGORY COX
George v. NDOC et al
as 2:2012cv00175
Defendant:
James Gregory Cox, S. Espinoza, NDOC and others
Plaintiff:
David L George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dennie v. Williams et al
as 2:2011cv00828
Defendant:
Cheryl Burson, James Gregory Cox, Helix Electric, Inc., and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Dennie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
