Cases 81 - 90 of 104
Dixon v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2013cv03161
Petitioner:
Wallace L. Dixon, III
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Batista v. Watson et al
as 5:2013cv03152
Plaintiff:
Raul Batista
Defendant:
Jarred Watson, James Heimgartner and Douglas W. Burris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero (ID 63334) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2013cv03139
Petitioner:
Christopher Edward Romero
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed (ID 72142) v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2013cv03131
Plaintiff:
Noah Reed
Defendant:
James Heimgartner and Deane Donley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glynn v. Heimgartner, et al
as 13-3154
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICO L. GLYNN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Glynn v. Heimgartner, et al
as 13-3155
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICO L. GLYNN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Rojas v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2013cv03073
Plaintiff:
Jose Rojas
Defendant:
James Heimgartner and El Dorado Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2012cv03250
Plaintiff:
Charley Hughes
Defendant:
James Heimgartner and (fnu) Phelan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foshee v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2012cv03230
Plaintiff:
John Harold Foshee
Defendant:
James Heimgartner, Correct Care Solutions, State Board of Kansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Heimgartner et al
as 5:2012cv03119
Petitioner:
Richard T. Powell
Respondent:
James Heimgartner and Steve Six
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
