Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Johnson v. Lotches, et al
as 21-1045
Defendant / Appellee:
BUNKS, SHOEMAKER, COLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Little, et al
as 21-1042
Defendant / Appellee:
SHOEMAKER, CHAD, COLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Lotches et al
as 1:2021cv00178
Defendant:
Moore, Deeder, Allenback and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Little et al
as 1:2021cv00087
Defendant:
Dian Fergerson, Crawford, Ponce and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Matevousian et al
as 1:2020cv03658
Plaintiff:
Lennis James Hill
Defendant:
Gourodono, Stancil, Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rifle Onion Company LLC v. Hellman et al
as 1:2020cv03514
Defendant:
Labyrinth Holdings, LLC, James Hill, Meghan Nicole Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Rifle Onion Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 1:2020cv00749
Defendant:
Benard and James Hill
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CBD970, LLC v. Labyrinth Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00617
Plaintiff:
CBD970, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, also known as CBD970.com, LLC, CBD and CBD970, LLC
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
LABYRINTH HOLDINGS, INC., JAMES HILL, ROBERT HELLMAN and others
Defendant:
LABYRINTH HOLDINGS LLC, a California Limited Liability Company and Organic Growers LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Eagle Springs Organic LLC, Kenneth Sack and Adam Ayers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 1:2020cv00590
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
James Hill and Dean Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hill et al
as 1:2020cv00575
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Hampton and James Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
