Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Fitzpatrick et al v. Foodora GMBH et al
as 2:2018cv08442
Plaintiff:
Sam Hollander, John Wicks, Michael Fitzpatrick and others
Defendant:
Foodora GMBH, Jonas Winter-Scholz, Jeremy Carne and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
King v. The County of Santa Clara
as 5:2018cv03093
Plaintiff:
James King
Defendant:
The County of Santa Clara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King et al v. Axlehire, Inc.
as 3:2018cv01621
Plaintiff:
James King , Krisia Barrera and Shemicka Johnson
Defendant:
Axlehire, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
King et al v. Axlehire, Inc.
as 3:2018cv01592
Defendant:
Axlehire, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James King , Krisia Barrera and Shemicka Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Giovanni Martinez, et al v. Flowers Foods, Inc, et al
as 16-56327
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI MARTINEZ, JOSE ALMENDARIZ, JAMES KING and others
Movant - Appellant:
ANDREW NELSON, proposed plantiff intervenor and SAMUEL FALCON, proposed plantiff intervenor
Defendant - Appellee:
FLOWERS FOODS, INC, FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF CALIFORNIA, FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF HENDERSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03076
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Giovanni Martinez et al v. Flowers Foods, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05112
Plaintiff:
Jose Almendariz, James King, Humberto Lopez and others
Defendant:
Does, Flowers Bakeries Brands, Inc., Flowers Baking Co. of California and others
King v. Bosenko et al
as 2:2012cv02940
Plaintiff:
Jesse James King
Defendant:
Tom Bosenko , Dave Kent , Mike Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tashami Sims v. John Kelly, et al
as 12-57137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TASHAMI SIMS, AKA James King
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN KELLY, DAVID CHAVEZ, LUIS SANCHEZ and others
King v. Neven et al
as 2:2012cv00572
Defendant:
Scott Alexander, Maintenance Mike, Cole Morrow and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew James King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
