Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters Trust et al v. Superior Windows & Glass Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Employee Painters' Trust, Board of Trustees of the Western Glaziers Retirement Fund, Board of Trustees of the District Council No. 5 Apprenticeship and Training Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Superior Windows & Glass, Inc., James Monroe Woodell, Does & Roes I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Layton et al v. The United States of America
as 3:2020cv00391
Defendant:
Victor Abraham Cornejo and The United States of America
Plaintiff:
James Monroe Layton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
James Monroe, Jr. v. Scott Kernan et al
as 2:2017cv02714
Defendant:
J. Heinlen, J. Heinlen and Scott Kernan
Plaintiff:
James Monroe, Jr.
Flowers, Jr v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv00782
Petitioner:
James Monroe Flowers, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
James Monroe, Jr. v. J. Heinlen et al
as 2:2014cv03202
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, J. Heinlen, J. Heinlen and others
Plaintiff:
James Monroe, Jr.
Flowers v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Monroe Flowers, Jr
Defendant:
State of Washington, City of Seattle, King County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. James Flowers, Jr.
as 13-30002
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES MONROE FLOWERS, Jr.
James Monroe v. Matthew Cate
as 11-55520
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES MONROE
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE
Schrock et al v. Isuzu Motors Limited et al
as 4:2010cv00521
Plaintiff:
Stacy Schrock , Christina Monroe , Laurel Monroe and others
Defendant:
Isuzu Motors Limited, Isuzu North America Corporation, Isuzu Motors America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
