Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Hill v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Thomas Hill
Defendant:
State of Montana, Montana State Prison, James Salmonsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milless v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Chad R. Milless
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Friedt v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Dennis Friedt
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warner v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner, Jr
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Tracy Reveal, Chae Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherbondy v. Salmonsen
as 4:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Eugene Edwin Sherbondy
Respondent:
James Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Braulick v. Salmonsen, et al.
as 24-180
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEREMY JOHN BRAULICK
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES SALMONSEN and AUSTIN KNUDSEN
Bauer v. Salmonsen et al
as 2:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Chester R. Bauer
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matt v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Joseph Dwayne Matt
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grussing v. Salmonsen, et al.
as 23-3593
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM D GRUSSING
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES SALMONSEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Nichols v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Tom Nichols
Defendant:
Brian Gootkin, Todd Bose, Jodie Cosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
