Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00939
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickens v. Desrosiers et al
as 1:2016cv00911
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Dickens
Defendant:
Louise Desrosiers, Tamar Jackson , Connections Community Support Programs Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00895
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Christo et al
as 1:2016cv00433
Plaintiff:
David M. Watson
Defendant:
Gus Christo, Katrina Burley, Joseph Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. Phelps
as 1:2015cv00325
Plaintiff:
Idris Young, Ernest Parson, Michael Manley and others
Defendant:
Perry Phelps , David Pierce , James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardwick v. Phelps
as 1:2015cv00326
Plaintiff:
James Hardwick
Defendant:
Perry Phelps , David Pierce , James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Saunders v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 14-4643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT SAUNDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR JACK MARKELL, FORMER COMMISSIONER CARL C. DANBERG, COMMISSIONER ROBERT COUPE and others
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, CONNECTIONS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, DR. LAURIE SPRAGA, MEDICAL DIRECTOR and others
James Biggins v. Robert Burns, et al
as 14-4582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
ROBERT M. BURNS, BERRY BURNMAN, JOHN BURTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA, RONALD L. WILEY, JAMES SCARBOROUGH and others
Fatir v. Jones et al
as 1:2014cv01329
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Raynard Jones, David Pierce, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
