Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Davis v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv02090
Plaintiff:
Bryant Davis and Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
Lieutenant James Smith, Corizon Health Services Inc., Physician Assistant Robert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00922
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Martin
Defendant:
Warden, Warden Ronald S. Weber, Jeff Coates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Oliveri & Associates LLC
as 1:2020cv02598
Defendant:
OLIVERI & ASSOCIATES LLC
Plaintiff:
James Smith and Kuru Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Canter v. Warden Ronald Weber et al
as 8:2020cv01894
Defendant:
Warden Ronald Weber, Jamal Simms, CO Hedrick and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Maree Canter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wiggins v. Green et al
as 8:2020cv00909
Defendant:
Lieutenant James Smith, Warden Ronald Weber, Correctional Officer John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Townsend v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services et al
as 8:2019cv02803
Defendant:
C.O. A. Connell, C.O. Carr, C.O. D. Frenzel and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Jamal Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Locklear v. Moyer et al
as 8:2017cv03829
Plaintiff:
Adam Locklear
Defendant:
Stephen T. Moyer, Richard J. Graham, Jr., James Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Moyer et al
as 8:2017cv03385
Plaintiff:
Devon Townsend
Defendant:
Stephen T. Moyer, Richard J. Graham, Jr. and James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Maryland Division of Corrections
as 8:2016cv02676
Plaintiff:
Damon James Smith
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Smith et al
as 1:2015cv01643
Plaintiff:
Larry Elliott Taylor
Defendant:
James Smith and Cheryl Cordero
Movant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
