Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00470
Plaintiff:
Sherry Smith and William James Smith, III
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv29425
Plaintiff:
Barbara Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29405
Plaintiff:
Carol J. Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25923
Plaintiff:
Lisa Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv11301
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00551
Plaintiff:
Melody A. Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv27809
Plaintiff:
Betty Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv27406
Plaintiff:
Judy Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv20331
Plaintiff:
Camille Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv14686
Plaintiff:
Peggy J. Smith and James Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
