Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Pepe v. Walsh
as 19-3668
Respondent / Appellee:
James Walsh, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility
Petitioner / Appellant:
Vincent Pepe
Funches v. Walsh
as 19-1598
Respondent / Appellee:
James Walsh, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility,
Petitioner / Appellant:
Trevis L. Funches, Sr.
Funches v. Walsh
as 19-1280
Respondent:
James Walsh, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility,
Petitioner:
Trevis L. Funches, Sr.
Pepe v. Walsh
as 19-694
Respondent / Appellee:
James Walsh, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility
Petitioner / Appellant:
Vincent Pepe
Keitt v. John/Jane Doe #4
as 17-1615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Devin Keitt
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Brian S. Fischer, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, State of New York and others
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, #4, as Chancellor of New York City Department of Education, John/Jane Doe, #1, as Principal of Public School 236, John/Jane Doe, #2, Dean and others
Pinto v. Walsh
as 14-2366
Petitioner - Appellant:
Richard Pinto
Respondent - Appellee:
James Walsh, Superintendent at Sullivan Correctional Facility
Dekom v. New York
as 13-2773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Dekom, Kenneth Jacoby and Robert Pendleton
Defendant - Appellee:
New York, Andrew Cuomo, Governor, Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Dodell v. Walsh
as 12-2663
Petitioner:
Nathan Dodell, AKA Allah Kasiem
Respondent:
James Walsh, Superintendent
Pepe v. Walsh
as 12-2530
Petitioner - Appellant:
Vincent Pepe
Respondent - Appellee:
James Walsh, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility
Dekom v. New York
as 12-1446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Dekom, Kenneth Jacoby and Robert Pendleton
Defendant - Appellee:
New York, Andrew Cuomo, Governor, Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
