Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Washington v. Plantif et al
as 6:2009cv00457
Plaintiff:
James Washington, Jr
Defendant:
NFN Plantif, NFN Wagner, NFN Crutcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Plantif et al
as 4:2009cv00590
Plaintiff:
James Washington, Jr
Defendant:
NFN Plantif, NFN Wagner, NFN Crutcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2009cv00030
Petitioner:
James Washington, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Washington v. Sims
as 6:2008cv00379
Plaintiff:
James Washington, Jr
Defendant:
Unidentified Sims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv01206
Plaintiff:
Albert James Washington
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rucks et al v. Koppers Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00134
Plaintiff:
Jaborie Rucks, Nicole Shuntae Russell, Mary B. Saldivar and others
Defendant:
Koppers Industries, Inc., Koppers Industries, Inc., Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Washington v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv00329
Petitioner:
Albert James Washington
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Standholt et al
as 6:2007cv00470
Plaintiff:
James Washington, Jr
Defendant:
FNU Standholt, FNU Badgett, FNU Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Quarterman
as 3:2007cv00545
Petitioner:
James Washington, Jr
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Quarterman
as 1:2007cv00190
Petitioner:
James Washington
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
