Cases 1 - 10 of 10
UnifySCC et al v. Cody et al
as 5:2022cv01019
Plaintiff:
UnifySCC, Tom Davis and Maria Ramirez
Defendant:
Sara H. Cody, James Williams, Jeffrey Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv08540
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Williams et al v. Northern Suncrest Apartments LLC et al
as 5:2017cv03512
Plaintiff:
James Williams and Project Sentinel
Defendant:
Northern Suncrest Apartments LLC , James Wu , Joe Tai-Chang Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Delvin Jackson v. James Williams et al
as 2:2017cv01902
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, DOES, Gustavo Viramontes and others
Plaintiff:
Delvin Jackson
Rodriguez v. Oakland Unified School District et al
as 4:2016cv00402
Defendant:
Oakland Unified School District, Oakland School Police Department, Noil Angelo and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rodriguez and Ignacio Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. USA et al
as 2:2015cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jayaton-Kerry Edward Thomas
Defendant:
USA, CEO of USA, Dale A. Drozd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal, et al v. California City, et al
as 1:2014cv00269
Plaintiff:
James William Neal, III and Cordelia Neal
Defendant:
California City , California City Police Department , Christopher Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00398
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2009cv01053
Plaintiff:
Odell James Williams
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Police Department and Kevin Dempsey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
