Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Kelley v. Chesapeake Operating, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv03407
Defendant:
Chesapeake Operating, Inc. , Halliburton Company and Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James William Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of James William Jones v. Medical Center of McKinney et al
as 4:2011cv00582
Plaintiff:
James William Jones
Defendant:
Medical Center of McKinney Wysong Campus and Dante Burgos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Class v. Mooney et al.
as 1:2011cv00373
Petitioner:
Dwight Lee Class
Respondent:
Adam Johnson, Alice Johnson, Randy Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Shams v. Mooney et al
as 1:2011cv00372
Respondent:
Adam Johnson, Alice Johnson, Randy Mooney and others
Petitioner:
Huda Hassen Shams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. United States Of America
as 7:2011cv00045
Respondent:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Iry James Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Thaler
as 4:2010cv03776
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCKEE v. SMITH, M.D.
as 4:2010cv01323
Defendant:
JAMES WILLIAM SMITH, M.D. and WYETH LLC
Plaintiff:
GLENDA MCKEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norsworthy v. Thaler
as 1:2009cv01015
Petitioner:
James William Norsworthy
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norsworthy v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00902
Petitioner:
James William Norsworthy
Respondent:
Nathanial Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norsworthy v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00849
Petitioner:
James William Norsworthy
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
